The proof
Reliability isn't a promise. It's the architecture.
Most “production AI” demos well, then collapses under scrutiny. VibeManager is built so the failure modes can't happen. Here's what's true by design, not by marketing.
Deterministic control flow.
What runs next is decided by a state machine, not an AI guess, so runs are reproducible. The same inputs select the same next step.
Every step is verified.
A piece of work must exist, parse, and carry the right structure before the team moves on. Nothing advances on a broken step.
You hold the merge.
Nothing reaches your main branch without an explicit human merge. No auto-merge exists anywhere in the product.
Changes propagate.
The dependency graph flags every downstream piece when a requirement changes, no silent drift between your plan and your build.
These are product facts, checkable in the open-source core, not benchmark numbers.
We measure production-readiness, not demo quality.
The benchmark pits VibeManager against raw agents and the prototype tools on identical builds, in the open. The rubric and raw data will publish alongside the numbers.
Status · methodology published, runs in progress
We're running the full benchmark against raw AI tools on identical builds, and we'll publish the rubric, the task prompts, and the raw scored data alongside the headline numbers. No number ships until a real run produces it. That's the same standard we hold the product to.
The rubric: six axes, scored blind, three runs per tool
| Production-ready | Builds, runs, and handles the core flow with zero manual repair. |
|---|---|
| Requirements coverage | Share of the stated requirements actually implemented. |
| Cross-file consistency | No contradictions across files and layers, naming, types, contracts. |
| Handoff integrity | Outputs load into the next step and downstream tools without breakage. |
| Reviewable diff | Each change is contained and readable enough to review and merge. |
| Determinism | Same prompt, three runs, consistent structure and quality across all three. |
Protocol: the same fixed prompts to every tool · three runs per tool–task pair · blind scoring against the rubric · adversarial scenarios (ambiguous specs, mid-build changes, recovery from a failing step) scored pass/fail. If a number can't be sourced to a run, it doesn't ship.
See it on your own idea.
The strongest proof is your own project, reviewed and mergeable. Start free, no credit card.
No credit card · Connect the AI you already pay for.